RE: [jade-develop] AchieveREResponder in FSMBehaviour

Subject: RE: [jade-develop] AchieveREResponder in FSMBehaviour
From: Caire Giovanni (Giovanni.Caire@TILAB.COM)
Date: Mon Sep 02 2002 - 10:36:22 MET DST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Caire Giovanni: "RE: [jade-develop] Question about tag ANY_TYPE and the New Ontology"
• Previous message: Cortese Elisabetta: "R: [jade-develop] new protocol"
• Next in thread: Cinzia S: "Re: [jade-develop] AchieveREResponder in FSMBehaviour"

Hi Cinzia,

Yes it is possible to nest FSMBehaviours. If the AchieveREResponder is never triggered probably the transition that leads to it is never fired.

Bye

Giovanni

-----Original Message-----
From: Cinzia S [mailto:cinzia.s@ntlworld.com]
Sent: domenica 1 settembre 2002 2.59
To: jade-develop@sharon.cselt.it
Subject: [jade-develop] AchieveREResponder in FSMBehaviour

Hi Jaders!

I've placed an AchieveREResponder as a sub-behaviour of an FSMBehaviour, but
it doesn't seem to be triggered at all. The AchieveREResponder has its own
registered behaviours which handles agree, inform and failure.

Am I doing something wrong? Is it possible to nest FSMBehaviours?

Thanks for you help
Cinzia

_______________________________________________
jade-develop mailing list
jade-develop@sharon.cselt.it
http://sharon.cselt.it/mailman/listinfo/jade-develop
UNSUBSCRIBE INSTRUCTIONS AT http://jade.cselt.it/mailing.htm#unsubscribe

• Next message: Caire Giovanni: "RE: [jade-develop] Question about tag ANY_TYPE and the New Ontology"
• Previous message: Cortese Elisabetta: "R: [jade-develop] new protocol"
• Next in thread: Cinzia S: "Re: [jade-develop] AchieveREResponder in FSMBehaviour"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2a22 : Mon Sep 02 2002 - 10:36:28 MET DST